POLLUTION LOCATOR|Hazardous Air Pollutants | 1996 Emissions Data Used to Estimate Exposures

County:      CULLMAN


HAP Sorted by Added Cancer Risk (per 1,000,000) Noncancer Hazard Index
Sort
Emissions from Point Sources (tons/yr)
Sort
Emissions from Area Soucres (tons/yr)
Sort
Emissions from Onroad Mobile Sources (tons/yr)
Sort
Emissions from Nonroad Mobile Sources (tons/yr)
Sort

DIESEL EMISSIONS 250 0.170 0 94 60
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 36 0.0220 0.022 0 0
BENZENE 21 0.0120.0084 13 68 11
1,3-BUTADIENE 3.3 0.000980 3.2 11 1.4
FORMALDEHYDE 2.9 0.160.0016 21 35 20
POLYCYCLIC ORGANIC MATTER (POM) 2.4 --0.000039 2.8 0.066 0.0036
CHROMIUM 1.5 0.00130.0017 0.019 0.0095 0.0068
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1.3 0.000150.00026 0.0080 0 0
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.94 0.00400.00028 5.6 0 0
ACRYLONITRILE 0.93 0.00160 0.056 0 0
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE 0.54 0.00950 0.000036 0 0
ACETALDEHYDE 0.53 0.0220.0037 3.3 12 9.6
CHLOROFORM 0.42 0.000260 0.15 0 0
TRICHLOROETHYLENE 0.39 0.0003223 1.3 0 0
1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE (MIXED ISOMERS) 0.24 0.000750 5.9 0 0
DICHLOROMETHANE 0.18 0.000450.0019 11 0 0
ARSENIC 0.13 0.00130.0026 0.0097 0.00018 0.0000024
ETHYLENE OXIDE 0.057 0.0000220 0.13 0 0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE 0.047 0.0000310 0.000023 0 0
NICKEL 0.045 0.00340.0018 0.039 0.0075 0.0036
CADMIUM 0.015 0.000400.00033 0.0012 0 0
VINYL CHLORIDE 0.015 0.0000390 0.067 0 0
BERYLLIUM 0.0070 0.00270.00014 0.00068 0 0
HYDRAZINE 0.0050 0.00000530 0.0000046 0 0
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0040 0.0000000280 0.027 0 0
LEAD 0.0020 0.00140.0027 0.018 0.013 0
QUINOLINE 0.0010 --0 0.000011 0 0
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0 0.00000250 0.0033 0 0
MANGANESE -- 0.00190.0032 0.096 0.0041 0.0076
MERCURY -- 0.000170.00054 0.0021 0.00013 0.0018
ACROLEIN -- 0.600.0019 3.8 2.0 1.5

NOTE: The National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) provides only aggregate data on 1996 point source releases in an area. To help identify sepcific companies which may be responsible for these releases, Scorecard disaggregates summary point source data to facility-level data based on the 2002 Toxics Releases Inventory (TRI). NATA and TRI data for an area often differ, because they involve different reporting years (1996 vs. 2002) and aggregation methods (NATA often includes point source emissions from outside geopolitical boundaries, since these can impact estimated exposures in an area).